The Madrid Protocol Explained

International·23 min read

The Madrid Protocol is an international trademark registration system that lets you file one application through WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) to seek protection in over 130 member countries. Instead of filing separate applications in each country, you can designate multiple jurisdictions through a single centralized process, saving time and cost while maintaining unified management of your international portfolio.

What is the Madrid Protocol

The Madrid Protocol is an international treaty administered by WIPO that provides a streamlined system for filing and managing trademark applications across multiple countries. Established in 1989 and entering into force in 1996, the Protocol now has over 130 member countries representing major markets worldwide.

Key Characteristics

FeatureDescription
AdministratorWorld Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Geneva
Member Countries130+ contracting parties (as of 2025)
CoverageIncludes US, EU, UK, China, Japan, Canada, Australia, and most major markets
Application TypeSingle international application designating multiple countries
ManagementCentralized through WIPO with one renewal covering all countries
Legal FrameworkBased on Madrid Agreement (1891) and Madrid Protocol (1989)

The Protocol works alongside national and regional trademark systems—it doesn't replace them but provides an alternative filing route that can be more efficient for multi-country protection.

Key Principle: The Madrid Protocol is not a "world trademark" system. Each designated country examines your application independently under its own laws. WIPO facilitates the process but doesn't grant or refuse protection—that's done by individual national offices.

How the Madrid System Works

The Madrid Protocol follows a multi-step process that begins with your home country trademark office and extends through WIPO to your designated countries.

The Five-Step Process

  1. File or own a base application/registration: You must have an existing trademark application or registration in your home country (called the "Office of Origin")

  2. File international application through your home office: Submit your international application via USPTO, EUIPO, or your national trademark office

  3. WIPO examination and registration: WIPO reviews for formal compliance and issues an international registration with a unique number

  4. Forwarding to designated countries: WIPO sends your application to each country you've designated for protection

  5. National examination: Each designated country examines your mark under its own substantive laws and issues protection or refusal

Madrid Protocol application workflow from base mark to national decisions

What WIPO Does vs What National Offices Do

WIPO RoleNational Office Role
Verifies formal requirements (fees paid, proper forms)Examines substantive registrability under local law
Issues international registration numberDetermines if mark is distinctive in their market
Manages central databaseSearches for conflicting prior marks in their database
Forwards to designated countriesApplies local absolute and relative grounds for refusal
Records subsequent changes centrallyPublishes for opposition in local jurisdiction
Processes renewalsGrants or refuses protection independently

WIPO's role is administrative and procedural—they don't evaluate whether your mark is registrable. Each designated country makes its own substantive decision.

Requirements for Filing

To file a Madrid Protocol application, you must meet specific requirements related to your base mark, eligibility, and application details.

Base Mark Requirements

RequirementDescription
Existing markMust have a pending application or granted registration in your home country
Same markInternational application must be identical to base mark (same appearance)
Same ownerApplicant must be the same legal entity as the base mark owner
Same or narrower goods/servicesCan cover fewer goods/services than base mark, but not additional ones
Office of OriginMust file through the trademark office where your base mark exists

Critical Dependency: Your international registration is tied to your base mark for the first 5 years. If your base application is refused, abandoned, or canceled during this period, your entire international registration can fall—a risk known as "central attack."

Applicant Eligibility

You qualify to file a Madrid Protocol application if you meet one of these criteria with respect to a member country:

  • Nationality: You are a national of a Madrid Protocol member country
  • Domicile: You are domiciled in a member country
  • Establishment: You have a real and effective commercial or industrial establishment in a member country

For example, if you're a US business owner with a USPTO trademark, you can file through the USPTO regardless of your nationality. If you have an EUTM, you can file through EUIPO if you have an establishment or domicile in the EU.

Filing Procedure

Filing a Madrid Protocol application involves working with your Office of Origin and completing WIPO's required forms.

Step-by-Step Filing Process

  1. Prepare your base mark information

    • Serial/registration number
    • Filing or registration date
    • Current status
    • List of goods/services covered
  2. Choose designated countries

    • Select from 130+ member countries
    • Consider individual fee vs supplementary fee countries (affects cost)
    • Review each country's specific requirements
  3. Complete WIPO Form MM2 or equivalent

    • Mark representation (identical to base mark)
    • Goods/services descriptions (use Nice Classification)
    • Designated countries list
    • Fee calculation
  4. Submit through your Office of Origin

    • US applicants: File through USPTO using TEAS or paper form
    • EU applicants: File through EUIPO's online system
    • Other countries: Check your national office's procedures
  5. Pay required fees

    • Fees paid to your Office of Origin, which forwards to WIPO
    • Includes basic fee, supplementary/individual fees, and office handling fee
  6. WIPO issues international registration

    • Typically within 3-6 months
    • Certificate issued with international registration number and date
    • Date of international registration is your priority date in all designated countries

Where to File

Your Base MarkFile ThroughNotes
USPTO application/registrationUnited States Patent and Trademark OfficeUse USPTO's TEAS system; office transmittal fee applies
EUTM application/registrationEuropean Union Intellectual Property OfficeMust have EU domicile, nationality, or establishment
UK registrationUK Intellectual Property OfficePost-Brexit, separate from EU system
National marksRespective national IP officeCheck if your country participates in Madrid Protocol

You don't need to wait for registration: You can file an international application based on a pending trademark application, not just a granted registration. However, a registered base mark is more stable for avoiding central attack.

Cost Structure and Fees

Madrid Protocol fees include multiple components: basic fees to WIPO, per-country designation fees, and optional class fees.

Fee Components Breakdown

Fee TypeAmountWho ChargesWhen Paid
Basic Fee653 CHF (~$730 USD)WIPOAt filing
Supplementary Fee100 CHF per class beyond first class (~$112 USD)WIPOAt filing (only for supplementary fee countries)
Individual FeeVaries by country (€200-€1,000+)Designated countryAt filing (only for individual fee countries)
Office Transmittal Fee$100 (USPTO), €300 (EUIPO), varies by officeOffice of OriginAt filing
Complementary Fee50 CHF per classWIPOIf goods/services don't meet requirements

Individual Fee vs Supplementary Fee Countries

Countries designate whether they charge individual fees (set by the country) or accept WIPO's standard supplementary fees.

Supplementary Fee Countries (pay standard WIPO fees per class):

  • Most EU countries
  • Many African countries
  • Some Asian countries

Individual Fee Countries (pay country-specific fees):

  • United States: $400-600 per class
  • United Kingdom: ~£200 per class
  • China: ~$350 per class
  • Japan: ~$200 per class
  • Australia: ~$150 per class

Cost Comparison Examples

Example 1: Three Countries (1 class)

  • Base fee: 653 CHF
  • Countries: France (supplementary), Germany (supplementary), Spain (supplementary)
  • Supplementary fees: 3 × 0 CHF (first class included in base fee)
  • USPTO transmittal: $100
  • Total: ~$830

Example 2: Five Countries Mixed (1 class)

  • Base fee: 653 CHF
  • Countries: US ($500), UK (£200), China ($350), Japan ($200), France (supplementary)
  • Individual fees: $500 + $280 + $350 + $200 = $1,330
  • Supplementary fee: 0 CHF (France, first class)
  • USPTO transmittal: $100
  • Total: ~$2,160

Example 3: Ten Countries (3 classes)

  • Base fee: 653 CHF
  • Supplementary fee: 200 CHF (2 additional classes × 100 CHF)
  • Countries: 6 supplementary countries + 4 individual fee countries (~$1,800 in individual fees)
  • Office transmittal: $100
  • Total: ~$2,880

Cost Efficiency Threshold: The Madrid Protocol becomes cost-effective when filing in 4+ countries. For 1-3 countries, direct filing may be cheaper. For 10+ countries, Madrid offers substantial savings.

Timeline and Process Duration

Understanding the Madrid Protocol timeline helps set realistic expectations for when you'll have protection in each designated country.

Timeline Breakdown

PhaseDurationWhat Happens
Office of Origin Processing2-4 weeksYour national office certifies and forwards application to WIPO
WIPO Examination2-4 monthsWIPO reviews formal requirements and issues international registration
Designated Country Examination12-18 monthsEach country examines substantive registrability (varies by country)
Total to First National Protections14-22 monthsFrom filing to protection grants in designated countries

Refusal Period by Country

Each designated country has a specific timeframe during which it must issue a refusal (called a "provisional refusal"). If no refusal is issued within this period, protection is automatically granted.

Country TypeRefusal PeriodNotes
Standard (12 months)12 months from notificationMost countries use this period
Extended (18 months)18 months from notificationCountries that opted for extended examination (US, EU, Japan, others)

If a country doesn't issue a refusal within its period, the mark is automatically protected—no further action needed.

Typical timeline from filing through national protections

Statement of Grant of Protection

Many countries (especially EU member states) proactively send a "Statement of Grant of Protection" to WIPO once they've examined and approved your mark. This confirms protection is granted. Other countries simply let the refusal period expire without issuing a statement—silence means protection is granted.

Central Attack and the 5-Year Dependency

The most significant risk in the Madrid Protocol system is central attack—the dependency of your international registration on your base mark for the first five years.

What is Central Attack?

Central attack refers to the risk that if your base trademark application or registration is refused, abandoned, canceled, or otherwise ceases to exist within five years of your international registration date, your entire international registration also falls.

Example Scenario:

  1. You file a US trademark application in January 2024
  2. You file a Madrid Protocol application based on that US application in March 2024, designating 20 countries
  3. In October 2026, your US application receives a final refusal for likelihood of confusion
  4. Your international registration, and all 20 country designations, are canceled because the base mark failed

Dependency Period

TimeframeDependency Status
0-5 years from international registration dateFull dependency on base mark. If base falls, international registration falls.
After 5 yearsInternational registration becomes independent. Base mark status no longer matters.

Transformation: Converting After Central Attack

If your base mark is canceled or ceases to have effect during the dependency period, you have the option to "transform" your international registrations into national applications in the designated countries.

Transformation Process:

  1. File national applications in each affected country within 3 months of the international registration being canceled

  2. Retain priority: The transformed national applications retain:

    • The original international registration date as priority date
    • The original goods/services designations
  3. Pay national filing fees: Each country charges its standard national filing fees for the transformation

  4. Continue prosecution: Each national application proceeds through that country's examination process as if it had been filed directly

Cost Consideration: Transformation can be expensive—you'll pay individual national filing fees and potentially need local attorneys in each jurisdiction. For 10-20 countries, this can cost $10,000-50,000+.

Mitigating Central Attack Risk: Choose a strong, already-registered base mark if possible. A US trademark registration that's been active for years is far more stable than a newly filed application. Some applicants wait for their base application to register before filing internationally.

Why the 5-Year Rule Exists

The dependency exists to prevent circumventing a country's examination standards. Without it, applicants could file weak marks in countries with lenient examination (to get a base mark easily) and then use Madrid to force those marks into countries with stricter standards.

After five years, your mark has presumably been used and established in commerce, so it's considered legitimate and can stand independently.

Managing Your International Registration

One major advantage of the Madrid Protocol is centralized management—many administrative tasks can be handled through WIPO rather than dealing with each country individually.

Subsequent Designations

You can add new countries to your international registration after it's granted—called "subsequent designations."

FeatureDetails
TimingCan designate additional countries at any time after international registration
CostSame fee structure (basic + supplementary or individual fees for new countries)
ExaminationNew countries examine as if designated at filing
PrioritySubsequent designation date becomes priority date in those countries (not original international registration date)

Strategic Use: Designate core markets initially, then add expansion markets as your business grows or budget allows.

Renewals: One Renewal for All Countries

International registrations are renewed every 10 years through WIPO, covering all designated countries with a single renewal.

Renewal FeatureDescription
FrequencyEvery 10 years from international registration date
ProcessFile single renewal with WIPO (not with each country)
FeeBase renewal fee + per-country fees (similar to initial filing structure)
Grace Period6-month grace period with surcharge if you miss the deadline
Selective RenewalCan choose to renew in only some designated countries, not all

Cost Savings: Renewing 20 countries through Madrid costs significantly less than renewing 20 separate national registrations.

Recording Changes Centrally

Changes in ownership, name, or address can be recorded with WIPO and automatically update across all designated countries.

Change TypeProcessBenefit
Change of OwnershipRecord assignment with WIPOAutomatically updates in all designated countries
Change of NameRecord name change with WIPOUpdates across portfolio
Change of AddressRecord address change with WIPOSingle update instead of 20+ individual country updates
Limitation of Goods/ServicesRecord limitation with WIPONarrows protection across multiple countries at once

Each recordation has a fee (~200-300 CHF) but is far cheaper than recording changes separately in each country.

Portfolio Management Advantage: If you have trademarks in 30 countries and your company changes its name or address, one WIPO recordation (~$300) updates all 30 countries. Direct national recordations could cost $5,000-15,000.

Advantages of the Madrid Protocol

The Madrid Protocol offers substantial benefits, especially for businesses seeking protection in multiple countries.

Key Advantages

  1. Single Application: File once instead of 10+ separate national applications

  2. Cost Savings: Significantly cheaper for 4+ countries

    • Example: Protecting in 15 countries via Madrid: ~$5,000-8,000
    • Example: Protecting in 15 countries via direct filing: ~$15,000-30,000+
  3. One Language: File in English, French, or Spanish—no need for translations into 10+ languages

  4. Centralized Management:

    • One renewal every 10 years covers all countries
    • Record ownership changes once
    • Update address once
    • Manage entire portfolio through WIPO's online system
  5. Simplified Portfolio Tracking: One international registration number, one renewal date, one central record

  6. Flexibility: Add more countries anytime through subsequent designations

  7. No Local Attorney Required for Filing: File through your home office without needing attorneys in 10+ jurisdictions (though local counsel may be needed for refusal responses)

  8. Fast International Date: International registration date is established quickly (3-6 months), giving you priority across all designated countries

Disadvantages and Limitations

Despite its advantages, the Madrid Protocol has meaningful limitations and risks to consider.

Key Disadvantages

DisadvantageImpactMitigation Strategy
Central Attack RiskEntire international registration falls if base mark fails within 5 yearsUse a strong, already-registered base mark; wait for base registration before filing internationally
Limited to Member CountriesCan't designate non-member countries (e.g., some Middle Eastern and South American countries)File directly in non-member countries separately
Individual Fee Countries Can Be ExpensiveSome countries (US, UK) charge fees via Madrid that are higher than direct filingConsider direct filing for 1-2 expensive countries, use Madrid for others
Dependency on Base OfficeMust work through your Office of Origin—delays or errors there delay your entire international applicationChoose base mark with stable, efficient office if possible (EUIPO often faster than some national offices)
Refusal Responses Per CountryIf a designated country issues a refusal, you must respond under that country's laws (may need local attorney)Budget for potential local counsel fees; not all countries will refuse
No Single Appeal ProcessAppeals are handled by each country's appeal system, not centrally by WIPOUnderstand each country's opposition/appeal procedures before designating

When Madrid May Not Be Best

Direct filing may be better if:

  • You only need 1-3 countries (direct filing is comparable cost)
  • Your target country is not a Madrid Protocol member
  • Your base mark is weak or recently filed (high central attack risk)
  • Individual country fees via Madrid are significantly higher than direct filing (rare but possible)
  • You need faster protection in specific countries (some national offices are faster than Madrid + national examination)

Hybrid Strategy: Many businesses use both Madrid and direct filing. File 15 countries through Madrid for efficiency, and file directly in 2-3 non-member countries or countries with lower direct filing costs.

Selecting Countries to Designate

Strategic country selection is crucial for maximizing the Madrid Protocol's value while managing costs and risks.

Factors for Country Selection

  1. Current Market Presence

    • Where do you currently sell goods or offer services?
    • Where are your customers located?
  2. Planned Expansion

    • Which markets do you plan to enter in the next 2-5 years?
    • Better to file early and establish priority
  3. Manufacturing and Supply Chain

    • Where are your products manufactured?
    • Where do suppliers operate?
  4. Digital Business Considerations

    • For e-commerce and SaaS: Protect in countries where users are located
    • For mobile apps: Consider major app stores' jurisdictions (US, EU, China, Japan, South Korea)
  5. Enforcement Concerns

    • Known for trademark squatting? (e.g., China) → File early
    • Strong enforcement mechanisms? → Prioritize for brand protection
  6. Cost-Benefit Analysis

    • High individual fees may suggest direct filing instead
    • Supplementary fee countries are cost-effective through Madrid

Common Country Groupings

Business TypeRecommended DesignationsRationale
Global SaaS/SoftwareUS, EU (EUIPO), UK, Canada, Australia, Japan, South KoreaMajor tech markets with strong IP enforcement
E-CommerceUS, EU, UK, China, Japan, Canada, Australia, MexicoTop consumer markets for online retail
Manufacturing ExporterCountries where products are sold + manufacturing countryProtect where you make and where you sell
Professional ServicesCountries where clients are located + countries where services are performedProtect in relevant service markets
Franchise/RestaurantCountries with existing or planned locationsProtect before expanding to prevent squatting

Start with Core Markets: Designate your highest-priority countries initially. Use subsequent designations to add expansion markets later as your budget and business grow.

Madrid vs Direct Filing: Decision Framework

Choosing between Madrid Protocol and direct national filing requires evaluating your specific circumstances.

Decision Matrix

FactorFavors Madrid ProtocolFavors Direct Filing
Number of Countries4+ countries1-3 countries
Base Mark StrengthStrong, registered markNo suitable base mark available
Base Mark StatusAlready registered for 2+ yearsRecent application or weak mark
Countries NeededAll or most are Madrid membersKey countries are non-members
BudgetLimited budget for multiple filingsBudget allows for individual filings
Management PreferenceWant centralized management and renewalsWilling to manage each country separately
TimelineCan wait 18-24 months for all countriesNeed immediate protection in specific countries
Individual FeesMostly supplementary fee countriesHeavily weighted toward expensive individual fee countries

Calculation Examples

Scenario 1: 6 Countries, Established Business

  • Countries: US, UK, Canada, Australia, Japan, Germany
  • Base Mark: US registration, 3 years old, actively used
  • Recommendation: Madrid Protocol
    • Estimated cost: ~$2,500-3,500
    • Direct filing cost: ~$5,000-9,000
    • Centralized management and renewal

Scenario 2: 2 Countries, Startup

  • Countries: US, EU
  • Base Mark: US application filed 3 months ago
  • Recommendation: Direct filing
    • Estimated cost: ~$1,100-1,300 direct vs ~$1,500-2,000 via Madrid
    • High central attack risk (recent application)
    • Not enough countries to justify Madrid's complexity

Scenario 3: 15 Countries, Scale-Up

  • Countries: US, EU, UK, Canada, Australia, China, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Brazil, India, plus 4 others
  • Base Mark: EUTM registration, 2 years old
  • Recommendation: Hybrid approach
    • Madrid for 12 member countries: ~$4,000-6,000
    • Direct filing in non-members (Brazil, India, etc.): ~$1,500-3,000
    • Total: ~$5,500-9,000 vs $20,000-40,000+ all direct

General Rule: If you need protection in 4+ Madrid member countries and have a stable base mark, the Madrid Protocol is almost always the most cost-effective option. For 1-3 countries or unstable base marks, evaluate carefully.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Madrid Protocol Basics

Central Attack and Risks

Costs and Timing

What's Next

You now understand how the Madrid Protocol works and when to use it for international trademark protection. The next step is understanding how different countries examine trademarks differently. Chapter 15 covers key differences between major jurisdictions—from use requirements to opposition periods—so you can anticipate each country's specific rules and avoid costly mistakes.