Opposition · USPTO

Opposition 91281936

OtherUSPTO

Opposition 91281936 at USPTO between Apple Inc. and Shenzhen Viatom Technology Co., Ltd., over the mark AZURPOD, filed Nov 22, 2022. Status in the office record: other.

Status
Other
Result
Other
Filed
Nov 22, 2022
Marks involved
12
Parties

Who is involved

The parties as named in the office record.

Opponent

Apple Inc.

Company trademarks
Respondent

Shenzhen Viatom Technology Co., Ltd.

Company trademarks
Timeline

How the case has moved

Dates from the USPTO record and the AZURPOD filing.

  1. AZURPOD filed

    Application 97237660 filed at the USPTO.
  2. Opposition filed

    Apple Inc. started opposition 91281936 at USPTO against AZURPOD.
Marks

Marks involved

1 contested mark, 11 marks the challenger relies on.

MarkRoleApplicationOffice
AZURPODContested97237660USPTO
IPODRelied on77013000USPTO
IPODRelied on78089144USPTO
IPODRelied on78653661USPTO
EARPODSRelied on85743152USPTO
AIRPODSRelied on86764566USPTO
HOMEPODRelied on87486392USPTO
HOMEPODRelied on87486450USPTO
AIRPODS PRORelied on88676261USPTO
AIRPODS PRORelied on88831036USPTO
HOMEPOD MINIRelied on90310574USPTO
AIRPODS MAXRelied on90366705USPTO
API

Get this data via the API

Every fact on this page comes from the Signa API. Track oppositions and cancellations on any mark with one request.

  • GET/v1/proceedings/{id}

    Parties, dates, outcome and every mark in the case

  • GET/v1/proceedings?trademark_id={trademark_id}

    Every proceeding on a mark

GET /v1/proceedings/{id}
ID=prc_c8e25ece-abc4-40bd-a1bc-c9fd676e0aca
curl https://api.signa.so/v1/proceedings/$ID \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SIGNA_API_KEY"
Response
{
  "id": "prc_c8e25ece-abc4-40bd-a1bc-c9fd676e0aca",
  "object": "proceeding",
  "proceeding_type": "opposition",
  "proceeding_number": "91281936",
  "status": "other",
  "office_code": "US",
  "filed_date": "2022-11-22",
  "parties": [
    {
      "name": "Apple Inc.",
      "role": "opponent"
    },
    {
      "name": "Shenzhen Viatom Technology Co., Ltd.",
      "role": "respondent"
    }
  ]
}