Opposition · USPTO

Opposition 91309216

SuspendedUSPTO

Opposition 91309216 at USPTO between Jack’s Family Restaurants LP and Since Sixty-One IP LLC, over the mark JACK'S DONUTS SINCE 1961, filed Jul 29, 2026. Status in the office record: suspended.

Status
Suspended
Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Marks involved
7
Parties

Who is involved

The parties as named in the office record.

Opponent

Jack’s Family Restaurants LP

Respondent

Since Sixty-One IP LLC

Timeline

How the case has moved

Dates from the USPTO record and the JACK'S DONUTS SINCE 1961 filing.

  1. JACK'S DONUTS SINCE 1961 filed

    Application 99627919 filed at the USPTO.
  2. Opposition filed

    Jack’s Family Restaurants LP started opposition 91309216 at USPTO against JACK'S DONUTS SINCE 1961.
  3. Next

    Suspended

    No decision is recorded at USPTO yet.
Marks

Marks involved

1 contested mark, 6 marks the challenger relies on.

MarkRoleApplicationOffice
JACK'S DONUTS SINCE 1961Contested99627919USPTO
JACK'SRelied on72196866USPTO
JACK'SRelied on72465200USPTO
EATATJACKS.COMRelied on76008890USPTO
JACK'S EST. 1960Relied on76347603USPTO
JACK'SRelied on85383229USPTO
JACK'SRelied on87382431USPTO
API

Get this data via the API

Every fact on this page comes from the Signa API. Track oppositions and cancellations on any mark with one request.

  • GET/v1/proceedings/{id}

    Parties, dates, outcome and every mark in the case

  • GET/v1/proceedings?trademark_id={trademark_id}

    Every proceeding on a mark

GET /v1/proceedings/{id}
ID=prc_b74e798b-60f1-48f5-96e9-51503f3d098d
curl https://api.signa.so/v1/proceedings/$ID \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SIGNA_API_KEY"
Response
{
  "id": "prc_b74e798b-60f1-48f5-96e9-51503f3d098d",
  "object": "proceeding",
  "proceeding_type": "opposition",
  "proceeding_number": "91309216",
  "status": "suspended",
  "office_code": "US",
  "filed_date": "2026-07-29",
  "parties": [
    {
      "name": "Jack’s Family Restaurants LP",
      "role": "opponent"
    },
    {
      "name": "Since Sixty-One IP LLC",
      "role": "respondent"
    }
  ]
}