Opposition · USPTO

Opposition 91193895

OtherUSPTO

Opposition 91193895 at USPTO between iGo, Inc. and David N. Hoffman, over the mark JUICED MOBILE, filed Feb 23, 2010. Status in the office record: other.

Status
Other
Result
Other
Filed
Feb 23, 2010
Marks involved
3
Parties

Who is involved

The parties as named in the office record.

Opponent

iGo, Inc.

Respondent

David N. Hoffman

Timeline

How the case has moved

Dates from the USPTO record and the JUICED MOBILE filing.

  1. JUICED MOBILE filed

    Application 77809868 filed at the USPTO.
  2. Opposition filed

    iGo, Inc. started opposition 91193895 at USPTO against JUICED MOBILE.
Marks

Marks involved

1 contested mark, 2 marks the challenger relies on.

MarkRoleApplicationOffice
JUICED MOBILEContested77809868USPTO
JUICERelied on76416513USPTO
JUICERelied on76552027USPTO
API

Get this data via the API

Every fact on this page comes from the Signa API. Track oppositions and cancellations on any mark with one request.

  • GET/v1/proceedings/{id}

    Parties, dates, outcome and every mark in the case

  • GET/v1/proceedings?trademark_id={trademark_id}

    Every proceeding on a mark

GET /v1/proceedings/{id}
ID=prc_b59a801c-3238-4d46-b6ae-14abd7fe4d85
curl https://api.signa.so/v1/proceedings/$ID \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SIGNA_API_KEY"
Response
{
  "id": "prc_b59a801c-3238-4d46-b6ae-14abd7fe4d85",
  "object": "proceeding",
  "proceeding_type": "opposition",
  "proceeding_number": "91193895",
  "status": "other",
  "office_code": "US",
  "filed_date": "2010-02-23",
  "parties": [
    {
      "name": "iGo, Inc.",
      "role": "opponent"
    },
    {
      "name": "David N. Hoffman",
      "role": "respondent"
    }
  ]
}