Opposition · USPTO

Opposition 91200559

OtherUSPTO

Opposition 91200559 at USPTO between Darden Concepts, Inc. and Aqua-Leisure Industries, Inc., over the mark BAHAMA BREEZE, filed Jul 6, 2011. Status in the office record: other.

View BAHAMA BREEZEGet this data via the API
Status
Other
Result
Other
Filed
Jul 6, 2011
Marks involved
5
Parties

Who is involved

The parties as named in the office record.

Opponent

Darden Concepts, Inc.

Respondent

Aqua-Leisure Industries, Inc.

Timeline

How the case has moved

Dates from the USPTO record and the BAHAMA BREEZE filing.

  1. BAHAMA BREEZE filed

    Application 85139643 filed at the USPTO.

  2. Opposition filed

    Darden Concepts, Inc. started opposition 91200559 at USPTO against BAHAMA BREEZE.
Marks

Marks involved

1 contested mark, 4 marks the challenger relies on.

MarkRoleApplicationOffice
BAHAMA BREEZEContested85139643USPTO
BAHAMA BREEZERelied on74720934USPTO
BAHAMA BREEZERelied on75153935USPTO
BAHAMA BREEZERelied on75975870USPTO
BAHAMA BREEZERelied on76137422USPTO
API

Get this data via the API

Every fact on this page comes from the Signa API. Track oppositions and cancellations on any mark with one request.

  • GET/v1/proceedings/{id}

    Parties, dates, outcome and every mark in the case

  • GET/v1/proceedings?trademark_id={trademark_id}

    Every proceeding on a mark

Get API keyView docs
GET /v1/proceedings/{id}
ID=prc_adfd6d84-1fcf-4d41-8392-b7ef60370460
curl https://api.signa.so/v1/proceedings/$ID \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SIGNA_API_KEY"
Response
{
  "id": "prc_adfd6d84-1fcf-4d41-8392-b7ef60370460",
  "object": "proceeding",
  "proceeding_type": "opposition",
  "proceeding_number": "91200559",
  "status": "other",
  "office_code": "US",
  "filed_date": "2011-07-06",
  "parties": [
    {
      "name": "Darden Concepts, Inc.",
      "role": "opponent"
    },
    {
      "name": "Aqua-Leisure Industries, Inc.",
      "role": "respondent"
    }
  ]
}