Cancellation · USPTO

Cancellation 92013670

OtherUSPTO

Cancellation 92013670 at USPTO between American Law Institute and American Law Research Institute, Inc., over the mark ALRI-AMERICAN LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE, filed Jan 3, 1983. Status in the office record: other.

View ALRI-AMERICAN LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTEGet this data via the API
Status
Other
Result
Other
Filed
Jan 3, 1983
Marks involved
2
Parties

Who is involved

The parties as named in the office record.

Petitioner

American Law Institute

Respondent

American Law Research Institute, Inc.

Timeline

How the case has moved

Dates from the USPTO record and the ALRI-AMERICAN LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE filing.

  1. ALRI-AMERICAN LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE filed

    Application 73184603 filed at the USPTO.

  2. ALRI-AMERICAN LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE registered

  3. Cancellation filed

    American Law Institute started cancellation 92013670 at USPTO against ALRI-AMERICAN LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE.
Marks

Marks involved

1 contested mark, 1 mark the challenger relies on.

MarkRoleApplicationOffice
ALRI-AMERICAN LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTEContested73184603USPTO
ALIRelied on73258177USPTO
API

Get this data via the API

Every fact on this page comes from the Signa API. Track oppositions and cancellations on any mark with one request.

  • GET/v1/proceedings/{id}

    Parties, dates, outcome and every mark in the case

  • GET/v1/proceedings?trademark_id={trademark_id}

    Every proceeding on a mark

Get API keyView docs
GET /v1/proceedings/{id}
ID=prc_86ae12b9-d382-4254-88f0-dfcf1378f1d0
curl https://api.signa.so/v1/proceedings/$ID \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SIGNA_API_KEY"
Response
{
  "id": "prc_86ae12b9-d382-4254-88f0-dfcf1378f1d0",
  "object": "proceeding",
  "proceeding_type": "cancellation",
  "proceeding_number": "92013670",
  "status": "other",
  "office_code": "US",
  "filed_date": "1983-01-03",
  "parties": [
    {
      "name": "AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE",
      "role": "petitioner"
    },
    {
      "name": "AMERICAN LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC.",
      "role": "respondent"
    }
  ]
}