Opposition · USPTO

Opposition 91194974

Decided: rejectedUSPTO

Opposition 91194974 at USPTO, over the mark SMART BALANCE, filed May 20, 2010. Status in the office record: decided: rejected (Opposition Dismissed).

View SMART BALANCEGet this data via the API
Status
Decided: rejected
Result
Challenger lost
Filed
May 20, 2010
Decidedafter 1,772 days
Mar 27, 2015
Parties

Who is involved

The parties as named in the office record.

Opponent

Promark Brands Inc. and H.J. Heinz Company

Timeline

How the case has moved

Dates from the USPTO record and the SMART BALANCE filing.

  1. SMART BALANCE filed

    Application 77864305 filed at the USPTO.

  2. Opposition filed

    Promark Brands Inc. and H.J. Heinz Company started opposition 91194974 at USPTO against SMART BALANCE.

  3. Challenger lost

    Office record: Opposition Dismissed.
Marks

Marks involved

1 contested mark, 5 marks the challenger relies on.

MarkRoleApplicationOffice
SMART BALANCEContested77864305USPTO
SMART ONESRelied on74528148USPTO
SMART ONESRelied on75415119USPTO
SMART ONESRelied on77368176USPTO
SMART ONESRelied on78351994USPTO
SMART ONESRelied on78352011USPTO
API

Get this data via the API

Every fact on this page comes from the Signa API. Track oppositions and cancellations on any mark with one request.

  • GET/v1/proceedings/{id}

    Parties, dates, outcome and every mark in the case

  • GET/v1/proceedings?trademark_id={trademark_id}

    Every proceeding on a mark

Get API keyView docs
GET /v1/proceedings/{id}
ID=prc_83b96d33-f81a-4ac9-b99a-6682a922949d
curl https://api.signa.so/v1/proceedings/$ID \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SIGNA_API_KEY"
Response
{
  "id": "prc_83b96d33-f81a-4ac9-b99a-6682a922949d",
  "object": "proceeding",
  "proceeding_type": "opposition",
  "proceeding_number": "91194974",
  "status": "decided_rejected",
  "office_code": "US",
  "filed_date": "2010-05-20",
  "parties": [
    {
      "name": "Promark Brands Inc. and H.J. Heinz Company",
      "role": "opponent"
    }
  ]
}