Opposition · USPTO

Opposition 91182933

OtherUSPTO

Opposition 91182933 at USPTO between Home Box Office, Inc. and Lite-On It Corporation, over the mark CENOMAX, filed Mar 12, 2008. Status in the office record: other.

View CENOMAXGet this data via the API
Status
Other
Result
Other
Filed
Mar 12, 2008
Marks involved
3
Parties

Who is involved

The parties as named in the office record.

Opponent

Home Box Office, Inc.

Company trademarks
Respondent

Lite-On It Corporation

Company trademarks
Timeline

How the case has moved

Dates from the USPTO record and the CENOMAX filing.

  1. CENOMAX filed

    Application 77188226 filed at the USPTO.

  2. Opposition filed

    Home Box Office, Inc. started opposition 91182933 at USPTO against CENOMAX.
Marks

Marks involved

1 contested mark, 2 marks the challenger relies on.

MarkRoleApplicationOffice
CENOMAXContested77188226USPTO
CINEMAXRelied on73262998USPTO
CINEMAXRelied on75327970USPTO
API

Get this data via the API

Every fact on this page comes from the Signa API. Track oppositions and cancellations on any mark with one request.

  • GET/v1/proceedings/{id}

    Parties, dates, outcome and every mark in the case

  • GET/v1/proceedings?trademark_id={trademark_id}

    Every proceeding on a mark

Get API keyView docs
GET /v1/proceedings/{id}
ID=prc_830fff18-36bd-4a9e-b83f-921c0d12fd41
curl https://api.signa.so/v1/proceedings/$ID \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SIGNA_API_KEY"
Response
{
  "id": "prc_830fff18-36bd-4a9e-b83f-921c0d12fd41",
  "object": "proceeding",
  "proceeding_type": "opposition",
  "proceeding_number": "91182933",
  "status": "other",
  "office_code": "US",
  "filed_date": "2008-03-12",
  "parties": [
    {
      "name": "Home Box Office, Inc.",
      "role": "opponent"
    },
    {
      "name": "LITE-ON IT CORPORATION",
      "role": "respondent"
    }
  ]
}