Opposition · USPTO

Opposition 91204996

OtherUSPTO

Opposition 91204996 at USPTO between LFP IP, LLC and Amari Daniel-Bey, over the mark URBAN HUSTLAZ, filed May 2, 2012. Status in the office record: other.

View URBAN HUSTLAZGet this data via the API
Status
Other
Result
Other
Filed
May 2, 2012
Marks involved
7
Parties

Who is involved

The parties as named in the office record.

Opponent

LFP IP, LLC

Company trademarks
Respondent

Amari Daniel-Bey

Timeline

How the case has moved

Dates from the USPTO record and the URBAN HUSTLAZ filing.

  1. URBAN HUSTLAZ filed

    Application 85287335 filed at the USPTO.

  2. Opposition filed

    LFP IP, LLC started opposition 91204996 at USPTO against URBAN HUSTLAZ.
Marks

Marks involved

1 contested mark, 6 marks the challenger relies on.

MarkRoleApplicationOffice
URBAN HUSTLAZContested85287335USPTO
HUSTLERRelied on75014961USPTO
HUSTLER XXXRelied on76326711USPTO
HUSTLAZRelied on76393620USPTO
HUSTLER VIDEORelied on77314657USPTO
HUSTLER HDRelied on77668581USPTO
HUSTLER TVRelied on78485451USPTO
API

Get this data via the API

Every fact on this page comes from the Signa API. Track oppositions and cancellations on any mark with one request.

  • GET/v1/proceedings/{id}

    Parties, dates, outcome and every mark in the case

  • GET/v1/proceedings?trademark_id={trademark_id}

    Every proceeding on a mark

Get API keyView docs
GET /v1/proceedings/{id}
ID=prc_82901bcf-6bfc-4e4b-871e-e24320cf818b
curl https://api.signa.so/v1/proceedings/$ID \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SIGNA_API_KEY"
Response
{
  "id": "prc_82901bcf-6bfc-4e4b-871e-e24320cf818b",
  "object": "proceeding",
  "proceeding_type": "opposition",
  "proceeding_number": "91204996",
  "status": "other",
  "office_code": "US",
  "filed_date": "2012-05-02",
  "parties": [
    {
      "name": "LFP IP, LLC",
      "role": "opponent"
    },
    {
      "name": "Amari Daniel-Bey",
      "role": "respondent"
    }
  ]
}