Opposition · USPTO

Opposition 91152649

OtherUSPTO

Opposition 91152649 at USPTO between Fitness Foods, Inc., and Gfa Brands, Inc and Conagra Brands, Inc., over the mark SMART LUNCH, filed Aug 6, 2002. Status in the office record: other.

View SMART LUNCHGet this data via the API
Status
Other
Result
Other
Filed
Aug 6, 2002
Marks involved
2
Parties

Who is involved

The parties as named in the office record.

Opponent

Fitness Foods, Inc., and Gfa Brands, Inc

Respondent

Conagra Brands, Inc.

Company trademarks
Timeline

How the case has moved

Dates from the USPTO record and the SMART LUNCH filing.

  1. SMART LUNCH filed

    Application 76111750 filed at the USPTO.

  2. Opposition filed

    Fitness Foods, Inc., and Gfa Brands, Inc started opposition 91152649 at USPTO against SMART LUNCH.
Marks

Marks involved

1 contested mark, 1 mark the challenger relies on.

MarkRoleApplicationOffice
SMART LUNCHContested76111750USPTO
SMART BALANCERelied on75127811USPTO
API

Get this data via the API

Every fact on this page comes from the Signa API. Track oppositions and cancellations on any mark with one request.

  • GET/v1/proceedings/{id}

    Parties, dates, outcome and every mark in the case

  • GET/v1/proceedings?trademark_id={trademark_id}

    Every proceeding on a mark

Get API keyView docs
GET /v1/proceedings/{id}
ID=prc_75125505-b920-49a0-87ca-0d7c7048f02a
curl https://api.signa.so/v1/proceedings/$ID \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SIGNA_API_KEY"
Response
{
  "id": "prc_75125505-b920-49a0-87ca-0d7c7048f02a",
  "object": "proceeding",
  "proceeding_type": "opposition",
  "proceeding_number": "91152649",
  "status": "other",
  "office_code": "US",
  "filed_date": "2002-08-06",
  "parties": [
    {
      "name": "FITNESS FOODS, INC., AND GFA BRANDS, INC",
      "role": "opponent"
    },
    {
      "name": "CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.",
      "role": "respondent"
    }
  ]
}