Opposition · USPTO

Opposition 91201097

OtherUSPTO

Opposition 91201097 at USPTO between E. & J. Gallo Winery and T. Neal Pringle, over the mark BAREFOOT BEACH BUM, filed Aug 10, 2011. Status in the office record: other.

View BAREFOOT BEACH BUMGet this data via the API
Status
Other
Result
Other
Filed
Aug 10, 2011
Marks involved
5
Parties

Who is involved

The parties as named in the office record.

Opponent

E. & J. Gallo Winery

Company trademarks
Respondent

T. Neal Pringle

Timeline

How the case has moved

Dates from the USPTO record and the BAREFOOT BEACH BUM filing.

  1. BAREFOOT BEACH BUM filed

    Application 85184812 filed at the USPTO.

  2. Opposition filed

    E. & J. Gallo Winery started opposition 91201097 at USPTO against BAREFOOT BEACH BUM.
Marks

Marks involved

1 contested mark, 4 marks the challenger relies on.

MarkRoleApplicationOffice
BAREFOOT BEACH BUMContested85184812USPTO
[Design mark]Relied on73643909USPTO
[Design mark]Relied on73756067USPTO
BAREFOOTRelied on73756097USPTO
BAREFOOTRelied on74581920USPTO
API

Get this data via the API

Every fact on this page comes from the Signa API. Track oppositions and cancellations on any mark with one request.

  • GET/v1/proceedings/{id}

    Parties, dates, outcome and every mark in the case

  • GET/v1/proceedings?trademark_id={trademark_id}

    Every proceeding on a mark

Get API keyView docs
GET /v1/proceedings/{id}
ID=prc_4119d6e1-fcfc-4309-bdb3-0176fd2a6a14
curl https://api.signa.so/v1/proceedings/$ID \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SIGNA_API_KEY"
Response
{
  "id": "prc_4119d6e1-fcfc-4309-bdb3-0176fd2a6a14",
  "object": "proceeding",
  "proceeding_type": "opposition",
  "proceeding_number": "91201097",
  "status": "other",
  "office_code": "US",
  "filed_date": "2011-08-10",
  "parties": [
    {
      "name": "E. & J. Gallo Winery",
      "role": "opponent"
    },
    {
      "name": "T. Neal Pringle",
      "role": "respondent"
    }
  ]
}