Opposition · USPTO

Opposition 91236292

OtherUSPTO

Opposition 91236292 at USPTO between Enterprise Holdings, Inc. and Lytx, Inc., over the mark DRIVECAM ENTERPRISE, filed Aug 16, 2017. Status in the office record: other.

View DRIVECAM ENTERPRISEGet this data via the API
Status
Other
Result
Other
Filed
Aug 16, 2017
Marks involved
4
Parties

Who is involved

The parties as named in the office record.

Opponent

Enterprise Holdings, Inc.

Respondent

Lytx, Inc.

Company trademarks
Timeline

How the case has moved

Dates from the USPTO record and the DRIVECAM ENTERPRISE filing.

  1. DRIVECAM ENTERPRISE filed

    Application 87022111 filed at the USPTO.

  2. Opposition filed

    Enterprise Holdings, Inc. started opposition 91236292 at USPTO against DRIVECAM ENTERPRISE.
Marks

Marks involved

1 contested mark, 3 marks the challenger relies on.

MarkRoleApplicationOffice
DRIVECAM ENTERPRISEContested87022111USPTO
ENTERPRISERelied on73346546USPTO
ENTERPRISERelied on78958771USPTO
ENTERPRISE FLEET MANAGEMENTRelied on85478612USPTO
API

Get this data via the API

Every fact on this page comes from the Signa API. Track oppositions and cancellations on any mark with one request.

  • GET/v1/proceedings/{id}

    Parties, dates, outcome and every mark in the case

  • GET/v1/proceedings?trademark_id={trademark_id}

    Every proceeding on a mark

Get API keyView docs
GET /v1/proceedings/{id}
ID=prc_3d30244a-4569-49d5-8808-8eca0596b200
curl https://api.signa.so/v1/proceedings/$ID \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SIGNA_API_KEY"
Response
{
  "id": "prc_3d30244a-4569-49d5-8808-8eca0596b200",
  "object": "proceeding",
  "proceeding_type": "opposition",
  "proceeding_number": "91236292",
  "status": "other",
  "office_code": "US",
  "filed_date": "2017-08-16",
  "parties": [
    {
      "name": "Enterprise Holdings, Inc.",
      "role": "opponent"
    },
    {
      "name": "Lytx, Inc.",
      "role": "respondent"
    }
  ]
}