Opposition · USPTO

Opposition 91209050

OtherUSPTO

Opposition 91209050 at USPTO between Sweetyet Development Limited and Guru Denim, Inc., over the mark LOVE HOPE DENIM, filed Jan 28, 2013. Status in the office record: other.

View LOVE HOPE DENIMGet this data via the API
Status
Other
Result
Other
Filed
Jan 28, 2013
Marks involved
8
Parties

Who is involved

The parties as named in the office record.

Opponent

Sweetyet Development Limited

Respondent

Guru Denim, Inc.

Company trademarks
Timeline

How the case has moved

Dates from the USPTO record and the LOVE HOPE DENIM filing.

  1. LOVE HOPE DENIM filed

    Application 85560910 filed at the USPTO.

  2. Opposition filed

    Sweetyet Development Limited started opposition 91209050 at USPTO against LOVE HOPE DENIM.
Marks

Marks involved

1 contested mark, 7 marks the challenger relies on.

MarkRoleApplicationOffice
LOVE HOPE DENIMContested85560910USPTO
DENIMRelied on77044399USPTO
DENIM BY CODAARelied on77855685USPTO
DENIM GO WILDRelied on77976803USPTO
DENIM GO WILDRelied on77977692USPTO
DENIM MINERelied on77978065USPTO
DENIM GO WILDRelied on77978720USPTO
DENIM GIRLRelied on78798942USPTO
API

Get this data via the API

Every fact on this page comes from the Signa API. Track oppositions and cancellations on any mark with one request.

  • GET/v1/proceedings/{id}

    Parties, dates, outcome and every mark in the case

  • GET/v1/proceedings?trademark_id={trademark_id}

    Every proceeding on a mark

Get API keyView docs
GET /v1/proceedings/{id}
ID=prc_31b21a19-15a9-4ffa-a16a-d3122e443af3
curl https://api.signa.so/v1/proceedings/$ID \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SIGNA_API_KEY"
Response
{
  "id": "prc_31b21a19-15a9-4ffa-a16a-d3122e443af3",
  "object": "proceeding",
  "proceeding_type": "opposition",
  "proceeding_number": "91209050",
  "status": "other",
  "office_code": "US",
  "filed_date": "2013-01-28",
  "parties": [
    {
      "name": "Sweetyet Development Limited",
      "role": "opponent"
    },
    {
      "name": "Guru Denim, Inc.",
      "role": "respondent"
    }
  ]
}