Opposition · USPTO

Opposition 91201777

OtherUSPTO

Opposition 91201777 at USPTO between Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated and David Craig Berns, Jacob Matlow, over the mark BECAUSE U DESERVE WHAT EACH INDIVIDUAL SHOULD ENJOY REGULARLY, filed Sep 26, 2011. Status in the office record: other.

Status
Other
Result
Other
Filed
Sep 26, 2011
Marks involved
10
Parties

Who is involved

The parties as named in the office record.

Opponent

Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated

Respondent

David Craig Berns, Jacob Matlow

Timeline

How the case has moved

Dates from the USPTO record and the BECAUSE U DESERVE WHAT EACH INDIVIDUAL SHOULD ENJOY REGULARLY filing.

  1. BECAUSE U DESERVE WHAT EACH INDIVIDUAL SHOULD ENJOY REGULARLY filed

    Application 85249422 filed at the USPTO.
  2. Opposition filed

    Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated started opposition 91201777 at USPTO against BECAUSE U DESERVE WHAT EACH INDIVIDUAL SHOULD ENJOY REGULARLY.
Marks

Marks involved

1 contested mark, 9 marks the challenger relies on.

API

Get this data via the API

Every fact on this page comes from the Signa API. Track oppositions and cancellations on any mark with one request.

  • GET/v1/proceedings/{id}

    Parties, dates, outcome and every mark in the case

  • GET/v1/proceedings?trademark_id={trademark_id}

    Every proceeding on a mark

GET /v1/proceedings/{id}
ID=prc_2fc9fa8c-ed36-42d7-835f-f6431900a68c
curl https://api.signa.so/v1/proceedings/$ID \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SIGNA_API_KEY"
Response
{
  "id": "prc_2fc9fa8c-ed36-42d7-835f-f6431900a68c",
  "object": "proceeding",
  "proceeding_type": "opposition",
  "proceeding_number": "91201777",
  "status": "other",
  "office_code": "US",
  "filed_date": "2011-09-26",
  "parties": [
    {
      "name": "ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INCORPORATED",
      "role": "opponent"
    },
    {
      "name": "David Craig Berns, Jacob Matlow",
      "role": "respondent"
    }
  ]
}